Vishwaroopam – an unpardonable offense-fest

kamal

Unlike many of you, blessed with the benevolence of various Indian government agencies, I have watched Kamal Haasan’s latest film, Vishwaroopam. How, at the end of such an offensive work of art, I am able to summon the courage to write this blogpost will remain unexplained. Allow me, oh dear reader, to guide you through the numerous shocking aspects of the movie and, before you go to bed tonight, please thank the heavens for living in a country run by sane and sensitive politicians.

(Spoilers ahead, the kinds that will give you nightmares)

1 Many years later, the one sound that will accompany every Vishwaroopam screening is that of wailing babies. Only a sinister mind will use so much ketchup and tomato sauce in a movie with a PG rating. Large pools of blood are not only offensive to impressionable young minds, they also insult parents who think they are capable of guidance.

If you are a parent or a child below 25, please stay away.

2 As a Tamil Brahmin, I ought to have walked out after the first ten minutes of the film, especially after the lead character asks a brahmin girl to taste a piece of chicken. First you take away our engineering and medical seats, then you make our girls eat chicken on screen. Dei. All this too much. We must rise as one, brandish our poonals and outrage.

If you are a self-respecting brahimin (irrespective of whether you are a vegetarian or non-vegetarian), please stay away.

3 This is a film that no Tamilian can watch without having an urge to reach for a sickle and chop up various parts of the screen. First you fool me by saying this is a Tamil film, then you get characters to talk in the most ridiculous accents. Tamil in an American accent. Check. Tamil in a Roadies-style auditioning accent. Check. Tamil in a thatthu-pitthu accent. Check. Tamil in an eeshifying accent. Check.

If you are a Tamilian with even a smidgeon of pride for your language (irrespective if whether you can read Dinamalar or not), please stay away.

4 As an Andrea Jeremiah fan, I was deeply offended that she appears for no more than forty three seconds. Or something like that. Seriously? She is in the damn poster, man. The official poster, for heaven’s sake. Why are you fooling people like me (who switches off the movie after Andrea Jeremiah is dismissed) with such tactics? This is a serious offense. And I am even more offended that nobody apart from me has taken offense to this.

5 Many African-Americans, who watched the movie with me, were deeply offended that one of their brothers were shown shaving his whole body with an electric razor. Yes, you read that right. He not only shaved the hair off his head, chest and hands but also went the full monty. Now this is taking stereotyping to a whole new level, Mr Haasan. As a fund-raiser for the annual hirsute-African-American summits, I am appalled.

6 Last of all, I think all citizens of New York city felt hurt by the fact that this movie – like eight thousand others this year – insisted on constantly showing the city’s skyline and the skyscrapers. Yes, we get it. That’s the first thing people see from the plane when they touch down at NYC. But seriously? Is that the shallow depths to which you want to sink? (Mixed metaphor, but I’m angry, da). Is that how, with one swoop of the camera, you wish to paint a whole city as little more than a concrete jungle that holds tall skyscrapers. On behalf of the Don’t-Judge-The-City-By-Its-Skyline Facebook group, I hereby declare I am deeply offended.

Mind it.

Published by Siddhartha Vaidyanathan

I’m a freelance writer, editor and author. My debut novel - What's Wrong With You, Karthik - was published by Pan Macmillan in India. You can order it here: https://www.amazon.com/Whats-Wrong-with-You-Karthik/dp/9389109507/ I have worked as a reporter and editor for ESPNcricinfo. I was part of the team that launched their digital magazine – The Cricket Monthly. You can read all my articles here. I used to write a fortnightly column for cricketnext.com, I host podcasts and (occasionally) write pieces at 81allout.com. I have contributed articles to Wisden, Nightwatchman, The Hindu, Mumbai Mirror, Indian Express, Forbes.com, AOL, The Guardian, The Daily Telegraph and Yahoo India. I have worked for Bloomberg News and Wall Street Journal as a features reporter.

34 thoughts on “Vishwaroopam – an unpardonable offense-fest

  1. There is vishwaroopam part 2 in which Andrea plays a more prominent role. He doesn’t call the paapathi he calls her brahminathi. In the first ten minutes of the movie. If she eats chicken it’s her choice why you bothered. Ok New York la New York skyline a kamikama pinna Chicago skyline ya kamika mudiyum… Put your brain into use while writing.

  2. Mr. Sidvee (I am assuming that you are a Mister)… I totally concur with you on Andrea Jeremiah. In fact, the first thing I mentioned to a friend of mine after I watched the movie was… “what on earth is that character doing in the film…?” What a waste of utilizable resources! So, you could FAKE less offense as you have a companion to brood over Andrea’s relative absence in the movie.

    I am hoping that in Vishwaroopam II (if at all it manages to be completed given the social and political in Tamil Nadu), Andrea will make it more than just the posters or the trailer!

  3. Lol. I haven’t watched the movie yet. But kudos to the government for having banned this movie, considering how seriously the actors have offended every single person in this state/country in every aspect possible . Vaazhga Jananayagam

  4. Sid:

    Enjoyed your post, da! BTW, just checked Andrea Jermaih’s wiki. It says that she has acted in ” critically acclaimed films such as Vishwaroopam, Pachaikili Muthucharam, Aayirathil Oruvan and Annayum Rasoolum, winning praise for her portrayals.”

    How shallow are the shallow depths you are referring to? Nanometers, I suppose..for nanosecond appearances!

    Cheers mate.

  5. Amen to the Brahmin-girl-eating-chicken observation. Amidst all this fracas, the fact that he has brought back “Paapathi” into the film lexicon after the dark days of Periyar is conveniently forgotten. Wonder how it got past the censors. Paapathi is as offensive as “Sandiyar”.

  6. Why do you write so little on cricket these days? If you don’t want to talk of India’s ordinary performance of late, at least write pieces on former players, like you wrote so beautifully about Javagal Srinath…

  7. Are you sure she is a Brahmin? I mean Kamal could turn it all round in part II and make her a Jew for all you know. And am totally with you on Andrea not getting enough screen presence. They could have switched the roles of the lead ladies, at the least.

  8. Damn, what about Mudaliars. Its time somebody offended them. why should these tamil brahmins always get it ? and thanks for letting us know your caste. What you are looking for jathakam here ? BTW did Raman Kamal’s lawyer paid up his EB dues ?

  9. Kamal always does this ..doesnt he ?..He takes Tambrahm for granted… in Slyly …..passing comments..and we move on.. ..and im totally with u on Andrea’s role… and there s a Gaping hole in Screenplay …only Rahul Bose justifies his acting prowess

  10. Dude, your post is full of crap.
    1.Kamal didn’t use “so much ketchup and tomato sauce” in a PG rated movie. The movie was rated PG with “so much ketchup and tomato sauce” – what’s the difference btw?
    2.If a Tamil Brahmin girl is portrayed as eating chicken, why do you bother? She likes it and she eats it. “I don’t like girls going to school. You don’t send them to school” – Are you playing Pakistan tribals? That’s primitive. And first of all, what is wrong in eating chicken? And you bring up
    engineering and medical seats. Seriously?
    3. I’m a Tamilian and I didn’t feel an urge to reach for sickle and chop various parts of the screen. So did other 60 mil Tamilians.
    4. Andrea – I could care less.
    5. What stereotyping? African Americans have pubes? Dude, everybody have pubes. And it’s South Asians who have body hair like bear. Shaving off the body is the religious belief of jihadist would be suicide bombers – so they are “clean” before entering heaven. That’s what they believe.
    6. NYC skylines – that’s all a Tamil fan at Mayavaram want to see. Broadway theaters and musical on an action film – I don’t like that combination.

    Having said all these, yes, there are a lot of blood and violence and sensitive topics. I also agree that not everyone will appreciate the movie. But calling it an “unpardonable offense”?
    If it’s Quentin’s it’s Academy award and if its Kamal’s is it “unpardonable offense”?

  11. What kind of chicken was offered to the lucky TamBrahm girl?

    Without this piece of vital information which you omitted carelessly, I cannot muster up any kind of outrage (or warm appreciation). A link to a recipe for the chicken dish in question would be appreciated.

Leave a comment